ArticleMedicine2025
Global research hotspots and trends in the field of surgical treatment of congenital tracheal stenosis in infants and children over the past 40 years: A bibliometric and visualization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital tracheal stenosis (CTS) is a rare and highly fatal airway obstructive disorder. Recent years have seen the recognition of several forms of surgery as safe and effective means of improving the survival of children with CTS. It is important to complement the comprehensive and systematic pulse combing analysis of this research field. In order to give future researchers ideas and references, we examine the literature on the surgical treatment of CTS during the past 40 years and compile a summary of the cutting-edge trends and research hotspots in this area. A search was conducted through the Web of Science database's core dataset for relevant publications pertaining to the surgical treatment of CTS from 1983 to 2024. CiteSpace 6.3, VOSviewer 1.6.18, Scimago Graphica 1.0.26, R-bibliometrix 4.6.1, and Pajek 5.16 tools were used for analysis and visualization. 327 publications total were found. With 82 papers, the US ranked first. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children National Health Service Foundation Trust was ranked first for institutions with 24 papers. With 48 papers, the Journal of Pediatric Surgery had the top spot among journals, while Elliott MJ had the highest ranking among authors with 15. Study keywords were sliding tracheoplasty, congenital long tracheal stenosis, airway reconstruction, interventional procedures, airway stenting, intact tracheal rings, degradable airway stents, modified sliding tracheoplasty, trachelectomy, difficult intubation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, central airway stenosis, balloon-expandable metal stents, airway mucosa, Pierre Robin sequence, ventilation. The existing body of research indicates that there is still a great deal of untapped potential in the surgical treatment of CTS. The research hotspot is the clinical efficacy study of selecting the optimal timing and sequence of surgical procedures for the treatment of CTS combined with cardiovascular disease, the use of extracorporeal circulatory devices as an aid to reduce the surgical mortality rate, and the exploring preoperative predictive risk by reviewing patient cases to explore preoperative predictive risk factor studies. The reliability and feasibility of a new index to objectively assess tracheal flow function before and after surgery, new bioabsorbable scaffolds with longer degradation times and increased radial expansion, and new technologies such as visualization surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.