ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Expression Divergence in Response to Sex-biased Selection.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cis-regulation of gene expression between sexes and life stages in Rumex hastatulus.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It remains debated whether greater degrees of sexual dimorphism would evolve if not for intersexual genetic constraints. Here, we used experimental evolution to partially break the intersexual genetic constraint in Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the effects of a shared gene pool on the evolution of sexual dimorphism in gene expression. In six replicate populations of 1,000 flies, a dominant marker (DsRed) was used to force a "Red" pool of genetically variable Chromosome 2 copies through exclusive father-to-son inheritance, while a complimentary pool of "NonRed" chromosomes was inherited primarily from mothers to daughters. After 100 generations, we demonstrated the effect of Red male-limited chromosomes in increasing male mating success. Differentially expressed genes between flies with and without Red chromosomes had on average higher intersexual genetic correlations (rMF), as expected if such correlations represent a constraint to sex-specific adaptation under normal inheritance. If conflict hinders the evolution of further dimorphism, the transcriptomes of male-selected Red chromosomes were predicted to evolve to be "masculinized" relative to female-selected NonRed chromosomes. Consistent with this, splicing patterns in Red males (but not Red females) were masculinized relative to NonRed males. Contrastingly, gene expression levels were largely feminized in Red flies of both sexes compared with NonRed. We discuss alternative forms of intralocus sexual conflict that may explain these patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.