Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629843›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

Expression Divergence in Response to Sex-biased Selection.

Karl Grieshop, Michelle J Liu, Ryan S Frost, Matthew P Lindsay, Malak Bayoumi, Martin I Brengdahl, Ruxandra I Molnar, Aneil F Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karl GrieshopSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8925-5066
Michelle J LiuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-8270-1451
Ryan S FrostDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-8698-5711
Matthew P LindsayDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9123-3261
Malak BayoumiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-0646-0838
Martin I BrengdahlIFM Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1052-7274
Ruxandra I MolnarSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Aneil F AgrawalDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-2733

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research CouncilSwedish Research Council 2018-06775University of Toronto's Faculty of Arts and Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains debated whether greater degrees of sexual dimorphism would evolve if not for intersexual genetic constraints. Here, we used experimental evolution to partially break the intersexual genetic constraint in Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the effects of a shared gene pool on the evolution of sexual dimorphism in gene expression. In six replicate populations of 1,000 flies, a dominant marker (DsRed) was used to force a "Red" pool of genetically variable Chromosome 2 copies through exclusive father-to-son inheritance, while a complimentary pool of "NonRed" chromosomes was inherited primarily from mothers to daughters. After 100 generations, we demonstrated the effect of Red male-limited chromosomes in increasing male mating success. Differentially expressed genes between flies with and without Red chromosomes had on average higher intersexual genetic correlations (rMF), as expected if such correlations represent a constraint to sex-specific adaptation under normal inheritance. If conflict hinders the evolution of further dimorphism, the transcriptomes of male-selected Red chromosomes were predicted to evolve to be "masculinized" relative to female-selected NonRed chromosomes. Consistent with this, splicing patterns in Red males (but not Red females) were masculinized relative to NonRed males. Contrastingly, gene expression levels were largely feminized in Red flies of both sexes compared with NonRed. We discuss alternative forms of intralocus sexual conflict that may explain these patterns.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterSex CharacteristicsSexual SelectionAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleMaleSelection, GeneticTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID40629843
PMCPMC12238715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.