Evidence mapPaperPMID 40630441Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Wearable Technology in Cardiology: Advancements, Applications, and Future Prospects.

Nihar Jena, Prabhat Singh, Deepak Chandramohan, Hari N Garapati, Jyotsna Gummadi, Maneeth Mylavarapu, Bushra Firdous Shaik, Athmananda Nanjundappa, Dinesh Reddy Apala, Christian Toquica and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nihar JenaDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25504, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7702-9034
Prabhat SinghDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Specialists of South Texas, Corpus Christi, TX 78413, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5264-2557
Deepak ChandramohanDepartment of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-9822
Hari N GarapatiDepartment of Nephrology, Montgomery Kidney Specialists, Montgomery, AL 36116, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3376-2227
Jyotsna GummadiDepartment of Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3427-585X
Maneeth MylavarapuDepartment of Health Informatics Management, Baptist Health Walker Hospital, Jasper, AL 35501, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2367-9615
Bushra Firdous ShaikDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospitalist, Piedmont Macon, Macon, GA 31217, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1504-1890
Athmananda NanjundappaDepartment of Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8818-0140
Dinesh Reddy ApalaDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Oklahoma Heart Hospital/Mercy Hospital, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7555-4348
Christian ToquicaDepartment of Cardiology, Trinity Health Oakland, Pontiac, MI 44405, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-5570
Boney LapsiwalaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical City Arlington, Arlington, TX 76015, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8303-6751
Prathap Kumar SimhadriDepartment of Nephrology, Advent Health/FSU College of Medicine, Daytona Beach, FL 32117, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-8466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the use of wearable devices continues to expand, their integration into various aspects of healthcare becomes increasingly prevalent. Indeed, significant advancements have been made in the field of cardiology through the application of wearable technology to monitor heart rate, rhythm, and other biological signals. This review examines the various applications of wearable technology in cardiology, with the goal of improving patient care. We evaluate the accuracy and functionality of existing wearable electrocardiograms, defibrillators, blood pressure monitors, fitness trackers, activity trackers, and sleep trackers, including their roles in cardiac rehabilitation. Furthermore, we highlight the significant advancements in wearable electrocardiograms, demonstrating their accuracy comparable to that of traditional monitoring devices, as shown by studies such as the Apple Heart Study and the Fitbit Heart Study. Recent research suggests that wearable electrocardiograms are comparable to conventional monitoring devices in terms of performance and can help reduce healthcare costs. However, as technological improvements continue to evolve, challenges related to accessibility, patient privacy, and the need for improved accuracy are also emerging. This review highlights recent advancements that aim to address these challenges. Nonetheless, further research is crucial to critically assess and identify shortcomings, as wearable devices possess significant potential to enhance cardiovascular and overall health.

Indexed as

arrhythmia detectionartificial intelligencecardiac monitoringdigital healthremote patient monitoringwearable technology

Identifiers

PMID40630441
PMCPMC12230838

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.