Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630973›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology bulletin2025

Systematic Review of Second-Generation Antidepressant Monotherapy for Acute Bipolar-II Depression.

Ahmed Elmosalamy, Nicola Keeth, Jin Hong Park, Danielle J Gerberi, Susan L McElroy, Mark A Frye, Balwinder Singh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The anxious bipolar phenotype: clinical complexity and treatment response.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed ElmosalamyElmosalamy, MBBCh, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nicola KeethKeeth, DNP, APRN, CNP, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jin Hong ParkPark, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Danielle J GerberiGerberi, MLIS, Mayo Medical Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Susan L McElroyMcElroy, MD, Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, Ohio, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Mark A FryeFrye, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Balwinder SinghSingh, MD, MS, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Individuals with Bipolar II disorder (BD-II) face high rates of depression and have limited FDA-approved treatments, leading to treatment delays and poor functioning. Although not commonly recommended, monoaminergic antidepressants are prescribed to 50% of patients. This review updates the evidence for second-generation antidepressant (SGAD) monotherapy in treating acute BD-II depression. Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science from March 2021 to February 2025 and included five studies published before 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating SGAD monotherapy in adults with acute BD-II depression. Primary outcomes were response, remission, treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS), dropouts owing to adverse events (AEs), and overall discontinuations. Results: Of 949 records identified, 12 studies were selected for full-text assessment, and six were included in our systematic review. The final dataset comprised four double-blind RCTs (n = 533), one open-label RCT (n = 83), and one triple-blind RCT (n = 40). Venlafaxine and sertraline produced short-term benefits, with response rates 60.4%-73.3% and remission rates 44.2%-58.5%. TEAS risk was ⩽ 19.9% and did not differ from lithium in head-to-head comparisons. AEs withdrawals were similar; SGADs often had comparable or better all-cause discontinuation than comparators. Conclusions: Limited short-term evidence indicates that SGAD monotherapy in acute BD-II depression is well-tolerated and has similar response rates to lithium, without increasing switch risk. Nevertheless, the evidence base is small and heterogeneous. Larger and longer RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy, characterize maintenance benefits, and inform personalized treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationBipolar DisorderAcute DiseaseAdultHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressive Agents, Second-Generationantidepressantsbipolar depressiondepressionhypomanialithiummood disorderssystematic reviewtreatment-emergent affective switch

Identifiers

PMID40630973
PMCPMC12233948

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.