ArticleJournal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2025
A Narrative Review of Nicotine and Alcohol Addiction Recovery Content on TikTok.
Article in Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Adolescent substance use remains a public health concern, and social media platforms may serve as potential intervention targets. The objective of this review is to characterize studies on anti-substance use and/or pro-recovery content on the TikTok social media platform. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles using search strings related to TikTok and substance use. Studies that characterized substance use content on TikTok and provided information on the associated hashtags were included. Studies that did not include hashtags reflecting anti-substance use or pro-recovery sentiments were excluded. Results: Seven studies included hashtags that expressed being against, quitting, and/or recovering from substance use. Most previous studies focused on nicotine use. The content was largely created by adults. General content themes included motivations for reducing substance use, barriers to, and advice on how to reduce substance use, and personal recovery journey stories that celebrated success and normalized the recurrence of use. Some studies found that content created by individuals with lived experience and content focused on the benefits of quitting (rather than the costs of using) received higher engagement. Most studies noted that videos identified using anti-substance use hashtags often contain irrelevant or antithetical content. Conclusion: This review highlights the value of social media sites such as TikTok as potential platforms for encouraging reductions in substance use. Future studies should quantify whether viewing and engaging with such content leads to changes in real-world measures such as reduced consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.