ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: Current Insights, Effectiveness, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewDysbiosis can disrupt intestinal barrier integrity and impact the immune and nervous systems, playing a significant role in developing disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of dysbiosis and its role in DGBI while examining the latest advancements in fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). It also highlights key challenges in the field and outlines critical directions for future research to optimize FMT strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes in this evolving treatment area. RECENT
findingsIn DGBI, dysbiosis triggers immune responses, increases gut permeability, and disrupts nervous system signaling, with contributing factors including diet, antibiotics, stress, and infections. Individuals with DGBI exhibit distinct microbial imbalances, such as an increased Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio and reduced beneficial bacteria. FMT has shown mixed results, with factors like patient selection, treatment protocols, and microbiome diversity influencing outcomes. While FMT can improve symptoms in refractory irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), effects may fade over time, requiring repeat treatments. Future FMT approaches should focus on targeted microbial interventions, considering the role of archaea, fungi, and microbial metabolites, while prioritizing optimal donor selection and large-scale trials for long-term efficacy. Despite the promising findings, FMT has not yet been widely endorsed in clinical guidelines due to the variability and heterogeneity of the data available. While much of the research has focused on IBS, studies have also explored the impact of FMT on other conditions such as functional diarrhea, functional constipation, and functional dyspepsia, which all exhibit altered microbial profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40632357What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.