Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40632429›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025

Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air-Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Xin Liu, Meng-Meng Ji, Ling Jin, Ai-Ping Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xin LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Meng-Meng JiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Ling JinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Ai-Ping ZengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. aiping_zeng@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7274-4497

Funding

Hubei Province health and family planning scientific research project WJ2023M025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate whether the air-fluid (A-F) exchange procedure should be recommended for silicone oil (SO) removal surgery.

methodsConsecutive patients that underwent SO removal with or without A-F exchange were requested to complete a questionnaire regarding the presence of floaters and SO residual scores. The medical records of the patients who completed the questionnaire were also reviewed retrospectively for clinical data including best corrected visual acuity, postoperative detachment rate, and intraocular pressure, etc.

resultsA total of 124 cases were included, 68 in the A-F (+) group and 56 in the A-F (-). Both groups were similar in demographic data such as age, sex distribution, axial length, and duration of SO tamponade (all P > 0.05). During the process of A-F exchange, a layer of oil film residue can be observed under the microscope, and A-F exchange can remove the residual SO. The ratio of with/without floating in the A-F (-) versus A-F (+) group was 48/8 versus 36/32 (P < 0.01). In addition, the questionnaire survey on the SO residual scores showed a more significant difference in the impact on postoperative visual quality between the two groups.

conclusionsA-F exchange can effectively reduce residual SO and is recommended as a routine procedure for SO removal surgery.

Indexed as

Air–fluid exchangeFloaterSilicone oil removalSilicone oil residualVitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID40632429
PMCPMC12271025

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.