ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2025
Clinical evidence and critical review of mesenchymal stromal cells for corneal and ocular surface diseases.
Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal stem cell-derived conditioned medium demonstrates novel antibacterial effects in ocular bacterial infections.Infection and immunity · 2026Article
- The Role of Epigenetics in Corneal Fibrosis.Epigenomes · 2026Review
- Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells in keratoconus.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), owing to their regenerative and immunomodulatory properties, have emerged as a potential therapeutic option for disorders affecting the cornea and ocular surface. Early-phase clinical studies have begun to demonstrate the safety and, to some extent, efficacy of MSC-based therapies in conditions such as dry eye disease, persistent corneal epithelial defects, ocular chemical injuries, corneal scarring, keratoconus, and limbal stem cell deficiency. However, evidence from some studies suggests that MSC-related improvements may be short-lived. Currently, the appropriate clinical indications, delivery methods, and long-term outcomes remain unclear, necessitating further laboratory and clinical investigations. In this review, we summarize published and ongoing clinical studies on the therapeutic applications of MSCs for ocular surface diseases, including our own group's experience. We critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of existing studies and highlight gaps and opportunities in this evolving field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.