ArticlePloS one2025
Clinical prediction of intravenous immunoglobulin-resistant Kawasaki disease based on interpretable Transformer model.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality and performance of machine learning versus logistic regression for predicting IVIG resistance in Kawasaki disease: a PROBAST+AI systematic comparison.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning prediction models for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: a meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning model for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: model development and validation study.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Severe viral rash progression prediction and surveillance early warning based on local-global attention and temporal convolutional network.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been established as the first-line therapy for Kawasaki disease (KD). However, approximately 10%-20% of pediatric patients exhibit IVIG resistance. Current machine learning (ML) models demonstrate suboptimal predictive performance in KD treatment response prediction, primarily due to their limited ability to effectively process categorical variables and interpret tabular clinical data. This study aims to develop and interpretable transformer-based clinical prediction model for IVIG resistant KD and validate its clinical utility. This retrospective study analyzed clinical records of KD patients from the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (Nanchong, China) between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2024. A cohort of 1,578 pediatric KD cases was systematically divided into training and validation sets. Six machine learning algorithms - Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), and Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network version 2.0 (TabPFN-V2) - were implemented with five-fold cross-validation to optimize model hyperparameters. Model performance was rigorously evaluated using seven metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC-AUC), and area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC). The top-performing model was subsequently subjected to interpretability analysis through Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to elucidate feature contributions. The transformer-based TabPFN-V2 model demonstrated superior predictive performance in KD analysis, achieving an impressive validation set accuracy of 0.97. Comprehensive evaluation metrics confirmed its robust performance: precision 0.98, recall 0.97, F1-score 0.98, MCC 0.95, ROC-AUC 0.99, and PR-AUC 0.99. Global interpretability analysis through kernel SHAP methodology identified the ten most influential predictive features ranked by significance: Coronary artery lesions (CAL), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), C-reactive protein (CRP), whether it was incomplete KD (KDtype), Neutrophil count (N), Platelet count (PLT), Albumin (ALB), age, White blood cell count (WBC) and Hemoglobin (Hb). Local interpretability analysis revealed distinct correlation patterns with IVIG resistance:AST, CRP, and N demonstrated significant positive correlations, where elevated values corresponded to increased IVIG resistance risk; PLT and ALB showed negative correlations, with higher levels associated with reduced resistance probability. Notably, age and WBC parameters demonstrated threshold effects, where optimal cutoff values enabled re-calibration of single-variable predictive scores. This threshold-dependent relationship suggests potential clinical utility in risk stratification protocols.The TabPFN-V2 model, leveraging an interpretable transformer architecture, demonstrates dual clinical utilities in KD management: (1) accurate prediction of IVIG resistance risk, and (2) data-driven support for personalized therapeutic decision-making. This framework enables probabilistic estimation of treatment resistance likelihood while providing transparent feature contribution analyses essential for developing patient-specific management protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.