ArticleBMJ open2025
Randomised controlled trial comparing low doses of aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia (ASAPP): a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04070573 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Doses Of Aspirin In The Prevention Of Preeclampsia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Doses Of Aspirin In The Prevention Of Preeclampsia (ASAPP)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertension Management in Pregnancy and Postpartum.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Review
- Low-dose aspirin in pregnancy: indications, efficacy, safety, and remaining controversies.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Toward Precision Aspirin Prophylaxis: Optimal Aspirin Dosing For Prevention of Preeclampsia.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPre-eclampsia (PEC) is a morbid and potentially lethal complication of pregnancy and is more common in women with risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune disease, kidney disease or multifetal pregnancies. Low dose aspirin (ASA) is currently the only prophylactic therapy known to decrease PEC in this patient population. However, currently, there is no prospective literature comparing various low-dose ASA formulations in the risk reduction of PEC. In the USA, the currently available low-dose ASA is over-the-counter and found in 81 mg tablets. Therefore, when clinicians initiate low-dose ASA therapy, they may prescribe one or two tablets of 81 mg per day without comparative evidence to guide their decision. Our objective is to prospectively compare pregnant patients on 81 mg vs 162 mg of ASA and determine a possible dose response in the prevention of PEC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a pragmatic phase 3 prospective randomised open label blinded-end point clinical trial with parallel assignment between two groups of pregnant people at high risk for PEC, as defined by the US Preventive Services Task Force and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). The primary outcome is the incidence of preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) PEC and PEC with severe features. Secondary outcomes include adherence to therapy, maternal and fetal complications of PEC, and time-to-event development of PEC across the two treatment groups. Participants are recruited from a tertiary care academic institution and its affiliated community hospital and clinics if they present for prenatal care at <16 weeks' gestation. Women are randomised and accordingly instructed to either take one or two tablets of 81 mg ASA daily. Participants are followed from recruitment until 6 weeks postpartum, with adherence questionnaires collected at 18-22 weeks, 24-28 weeks and 34-38 weeks gestation via a Simple Medication Adherence Questionnaire. After the first 100 pregnancies are completed, a prespecified interim analysis is performed to assess feasibility, tailor power calculations, and ensure safety. The second stage comprises the continuation of recruitment and randomisation to the accrual ceiling as determined by the first stage. Analysis will be completed in an intention-to-treat manner. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our research protocol and safety monitoring protocol have been approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine institutional review board (IRB) and the Office of Human Research Protection. Evaluation for adverse events will be monitored throughout the study period. Adverse events will be assessed at each study visit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04070573.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.