ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning for synchronous bone metastasis risk prediction in high grade lung neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bone metastases from endocrine cancer: advances in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone metastasis (BM) is common in high-grade lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to use multiple machine learning algorithms to exploring the significant factors associated with synchronous BM in these patients. Patients diagnosed with high-grade lung NETs were extracted from SEER 17 registries. Age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) was calculated. All patients were randomly divided into the training cohort and validation cohort (8:2). Eight machine learning algorithms were used to construct predictive model for synchronous BM in the training cohort, and the optimal model was selected for further validation. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret the importance of each variable in the optimal model. In addition, Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was performed to evaluate survival in patients with synchronous BM. From 2010 to 2021, the ASIR of synchronous BM in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) showed decreasing incidence (from 1.52 to 1.16 per 100,000 person-years, APC - 2.3, 95% CI - 3.3 to - 1.3, P < 0.001). No significant change was found for large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Approximately 23% of patients had synchronous BM at diagnosis. The stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) model, developed using ten-fold cross-validation, showed optimal predictive value both in the training and validation cohorts. The SHAP analysis indicated that liver metastasis had the most significant impact on synchronous BM. The median cancer-specific survival of patents with bone metastasis was 8 months. No survival difference was found between LCNEC and SCLC. The incidence of SCLC with synchronous BM showed a slight but statistically significant decrease over the last decade. These patients experienced poor survival. The selected GBM model could help identify patients at high risk of BM among those with high-grade lung NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.