Observational studyScientific reports2025
MISHTI study evaluating hepatic fibrosis in type 2 diabetes patients in India.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Bivariate Meta-Analysis of FIB-4 Cut-Offs to Rule Out Advanced Fibrosis in MASLD.International journal of hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatic fibrosis is a critical complication of metabolic disorders, particularly in patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Fibrosis 4 index (FIB 4) score in detecting significant fibrosis (transient elastography [TE] ≥ 8 kPa) and identify key predictors of significant fibrosis using logistic regression analysis in patients with T2D. This cross-sectional study, conducted across three tertiary care centres in India, prospectively enrolled and propensity-matched T2D and non-T2D patients to balance cohorts, resulting in a final analysis cohort of 472 patients (236 T2D, 236 non-T2D). Sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's Kappa were used to assess agreement between FIB 4 score ≥ 1.3 and TE ≥ 8 kPa. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of significant fibrosis. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using ROC curves. The FIB 4 score demonstrated high sensitivity (85.3%) but low specificity (13.7%) in the T2D cohort, with a Cohen's Kappa of -0.01, indicating no agreement with TE. In the non-T2D cohort, specificity improved to 47.2% with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.16. Logistic regression identified BMI, hypertension, and HbA1c as significant predictors of hepatic fibrosis in T2D patients, with odds ratios of 1.076, 1.824, and 1.279, respectively. Male sex, BMI, AST, and HbA1c were retained in the refined multivariate model, achieving an AUC of 0.735, indicating good discriminatory ability. Elevated transaminases were weakly associated with fibrosis, while BMI and HbA1c showed stronger associations. While FIB 4 is sensitive for detecting significant fibrosis, its low specificity limits its utility as a standalone diagnostic test, particularly in T2D patients. Logistic regression highlighted BMI, AST, and HbA1c as key predictors of fibrosis, emphasising the need to combine non-invasive tools with clinical variables for more accurate risk stratification and improved management of MASLD. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic algorithms to better address the burden of significant fibrosis in at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.