ArticleCancer research and treatment2026
Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment: KCSG Survey-Based Perspectives of Medical Oncologists, Patients, and Their Caregivers.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDespite the critical role of clinical trials in advancing cancer treatment, patient enrollment remains challenging in South Korea. We aimed to identify key barriers to clinical trial participation from the perspectives of medical oncologists, patients, and caregivers. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo web-based surveys were conducted in August 2022: one involving 100 Korean Cancer Study Group-affiliated medical oncologists, and another involving 100 cancer patients and 100 caregivers. Structured questionnaires were used to assess experiences, perceived barriers, and access to trial-related information. Focus group interviews (FGIs) were conducted with six patients and caregivers to explore qualitative insights in greater depth.
resultsAmong oncologists, 98% had prior experience with clinical trials; the same proportion expressed willingness to refer patients to other institutions. However, 76% reported failed or abandoned referral attempts, primarily due to insufficient information on trial eligibility and enrollment status. Although 86% of patients and caregivers were aware of the clinical trial, only 23% had actual participation experience. Physician recommendations emerged as the most influential factor driving participation. Nonetheless, most reported difficulties in accessing reliable trial information, citing unfamiliarity with search tools, complex content, and absence of centralized platforms. The FGI findings supported these results, highlighting the importance of physician guidance and identifying limited access to information as major barriers to enrollment.
conclusionDespite positive attitudes, clinical trial participation remains constrained by fragmented referral systems and inaccessible information. Establishing a coordinated, interinstitutional referral platform and improving user-friendly information delivery may enhance enrollment and promote equitable access to cancer clinical trials in South Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.