ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2025
Clinical benefits and future directions of medium cut-off membranes in hemodialysis: a comprehensive review.
Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A position statement and recommendations for sustainable kidney care.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- Budget impact of expanded hemodialysis versus high-flux hemodialysis using real-world evidence in Colombia.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Cast nephropathy in the ICU: Early recognition and extracorporeal strategies to improve outcomes.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Review
- Membrane-to-Patient Optimization: Individualized Dialyzer Selection for Extracorporeal Dialysis.Toxins · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes have emerged as a promising innovation in hemodialysis (HD), offering enhanced clearance of large middle-molecules of uremic toxins compared to traditional HD membranes, while maintaining minimal loss of albumin. The introduction of MCO membranes represents a significant advancement in dialysis technology, potentially reducing the risk of complications associated with inadequate removal of toxins. Compared to high-flux membranes, MCO membranes demonstrate superior efficacy in eliminating large middle-molecules without excessive loss of beneficial proteins, such as albumin. The clinical benefits of MCO membranes extend beyond toxin clearance. They improve quality of life, reduce erythropoiesis-stimulating agent doses and resistance, lower hospitalization rates, and decrease overall healthcare costs. Currently, there is insufficient evidence regarding the effects of MCO membranes on cardiovascular diseases and mortality. Further studies are required to assess their effects on patient outcomes and long-term survival. Future innovations in membrane technology, coupled with ongoing research and development, have the potential to enhance dialysis efficacy further, reduce complications, and facilitate the development of eco-friendly solutions. Additional studies are required to fully explore the potential of MCO membranes and refine their clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.