ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
The impact of sedation and analgesia scores on prognosis in critically ill sepsis patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Resuscitation to Rehabilitation: The Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Continuum in Sepsis Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a critical condition resulting from a poor immune response to infection, often leading to complications like sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). Research suggests a link between sedation and analgesia use and SAE development in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but study inconsistencies limit definitive conclusions. This study aims to explore the relationship between sedation and analgesia scores and the occurrence of SAE in the ICU, as well as their impact on clinical effectiveness and patient prognosis. Methods: Between January 1, 2021, and August 30, 2022, a retrospective analysis of 356 sepsis cases was conducted in the Emergency ICU of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University. After excluding 102 patients, 219 were included and divided into SAE and non-SAE groups for analysis. Results: The SAE group demonstrated higher age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and APACHE II scores, alongside longer ICU durations and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores ( Conclusion: The study demonstrated that patients with SAE exhibit physiological disturbances, including elevated inflammatory markers (IL-6 and LDH), impaired oxygenation, and acid-base imbalances, which may contribute to more severe clinical courses. Additionally, RASS and BPS scores were found to be reliable indicators of patient prognosis in sepsis. These findings may guide clinical practice in managing patients with SAE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.