ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Prediction for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), caused by biliary stones, is a severe inflammatory condition with high mortality rates. ABP recurrence is often linked to gallstones, necessitating effective treatment strategies. Despite recent advancements, the prediction of ABP occurrence following LC continues to present challenges, indicating the need for ongoing research and model refinement. Purpose: This study aims to develop a predictive model for assessing the risk of post- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy pancreatitis in patients with gallstones. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 968 patients who underwent LC. The patients were divided into the training set and validation set to develop and validate the predictive model. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified risk factors for ABP. A nomogram was constructed, and model performance was assessed using ROC curves, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results: The incidence of ABP was 9.07% in the training set and 14.43% in the validation set. Significant predictors of post-LC pancreatitis included baseline APACHE II score, choledocholithiasis, number of intubation attempts, timing of cholecystectomy, and biochemical markers (C-reactive protein, white blood cell, red cell distribution width, D-dimer, neutrophils, triglycerides). The predictive model demonstrated high discriminative ability with a receiver operating characteristic value of 0.949 (training set), of folds 1-5 ranged from 0.855 to 0.962 (5-fold cross-validation), and 0.922, (external validation set). Calibration curves confirmed stable prediction performance, and decision curve analysis indicated high net benefit across a range of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: The developed model effectively predicts the risk of post-LC pancreatitis in patients with gallstones, offering valuable guidance for clinical decision-making. Early identification of high-risk patients could improve treatment outcomes and reduce recurrence rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.