Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635890›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Association of dietary index for gut microbiota with frailty in middle-aged and older Americans: a cross-sectional study and mediation analysis.

Xiaodan Li, Ying Liu, Chuyi Shen, Changzhuan Shao, Hongke Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaodan LiFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macau Polytechnic University, Macau, China.
Ying LiuFaculty of Applied Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
Chuyi ShenFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macau Polytechnic University, Macau, China.
Changzhuan ShaoDepartment of Physical Education, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Hongke JiangDepartment of Physical Education, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While frailty poses significant challenges in aging populations, evidence regarding gut microbiome-targeted nutritional strategies remains limited. The novel Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM), quantifying microbial-pertinent dietary patterns, provides a framework for personalized frailty mitigation. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed 12,914 middle-aged and older Americans (≥45 years) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2018. Frailty status was assessed using a validated 49-item index (non-frail ≤0.21; frail >0.21). The DI-GM (range 0-10) was derived from 14 microbiota-linked dietary components through two 24-h recall interviews. Multivariable logistic regression with sensitivity analyses, restricted cubic splines (RCS), stratified analyses, and mediation effect were implemented to systematically evaluate DI-GM-frailty associations. Results: Adjusted analyses revealed a dose-dependent inverse association between DI-GM and frailty (OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.84-0.88 per unit increase). RCS identified a nonlinear inflection at DI-GM = 4.082 ( Conclusion: Higher DI-GM scores associate with lower frailty prevalence, particularly among women and highly-educated populations, partially mediated through BMI modulation. These findings establish DI-GM as a microbiota-targeted nutritional guideline for age-related frailty interventions, bridging dietary patterns with microbial homeostasis in geriatric care.

Indexed as

DI-GMfrailtygeriatric caregut microbiomemediation effectnutritional strategies

Identifiers

PMID40635890
PMCPMC12237688

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.