ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
It is time to share Alzheimer biomarker results in dementia with Lewy bodies.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comorbid Pathologies and Their Impact on Dementia with Lewy Bodies-Current View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Introduction to the special issue on ethics and equity in implementing novel biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: current progress and new directions.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Commentary on "It is time to share Alzheimer biomarker results in dementia with Lewy bodies".Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- It is time to share Alzheimer biomarker results in dementia with Lewy bodies.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Amyloid, p-tau, neurofilament light, and α-synuclein cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers across Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Parkinson's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are increasing calls for sharing individual biomarker results with participants in dementia research. No studies investigate returning Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker results to individuals with syndromic dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) even though most of these individuals have both pathologies. This perspective argues that AD biomarkers are valid, interpretable, and actionable, particularly relating to expected prognosis and treatment effects, in people with DLB. Thus, there is an ethical imperative to study AD biomarker result sharing in these patients. This will require revising current disclosure practices. Areas of need include unique pre- and post-test education and careful assessment of the readiness to receive results and post-result responses in people with DLB given the frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms in this group. Studying responses to sharing AD biomarkers in people with DLB will also inform other dementia settings (e.g., returning synuclein results to individuals with syndromic AD) and neurodegenerative diseases more broadly. Highlights: There are increasing calls for biomarker result sharing in dementia research.No processes exist to guide result sharing in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB).Alzheimer biomarker results in DLB are valid, interpretable, and actionable.Research is needed on the methods and effects of sharing with people with DLB.Research is needed for sharing evidence of co-pathology across neurodegenerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.