Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636378›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Cell therapy in pediatric blood diseases.

Rubí Romo-Rodríguez, Rosana Pelayo, Dalia Ramírez-Ramírez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rubí Romo-RodríguezLaboratory of Oncoimmunology and Cytomics of Childhood Cancer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Oriente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Puebla, Mexico.
Rosana PelayoLaboratory of Oncoimmunology and Cytomics of Childhood Cancer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Oriente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Puebla, Mexico.
Dalia Ramírez-RamírezLaboratory of Oncoimmunology and Cytomics of Childhood Cancer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Oriente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Puebla, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fight against mortality in pediatric oncohematological diseases is a story of human rights, academia, innovation, and technological advancement-one in which women in science have played a pivotal role. With talent, perseverance, and sensitivity, they greatly contributed to research in new cellular therapies, expanding the frontiers of treatment and giving the most vulnerable patients the gift of more years of life. This review explores multipotent and unipotent cell therapies, focusing on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation (MSCT), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell and natural killer (NK) cell therapy. HSCT remains the gold standard for high-risk and relapsed cases, with graft sources including bone marrow (BM), mobilized peripheral blood (MPB), and umbilical cord blood (UCB). Advances in MSCT highlight its role in hematopoiesis support and immunomodulation, reducing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risks. CAR-T cell therapy has revolutionized leukemia treatment, although challenges such as antigen escape, T-cell exhaustion, and treatment resistance persist. Emerging strategies, including CAR-NK cells, seek to enhance efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Despite these advancements, cell therapy remains complex and resource-intensive, necessitating further innovations for broader accessibility, particularly in developing regions.

Indexed as

CAR-NK cellsCAR-T cellsHSC transplantationMSC transplantationpediatric hematological diseases

Identifiers

PMID40636378
PMCPMC12237961

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.