ArticleJAMIA open2025
Utilizing Immuno-Oncology registry data for enhanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment predictions.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: We aim to leverage more comprehensive phenotypic and genotypic clinical data to enhance the treatment response predictions. Materials and Methods: The study cohort includes 213 NSCLC patients who underwent ICI therapy. Patients were categorized based on treatment outcomes: those with complete or partial responses were considered responders, while those exhibiting stable or progressive disease were deemed non-responders. Comprehensive phenotypic and genomic features were selected for prediction. We developed 9 machine learning models. The model demonstrating the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) performance was further analyzed using Shapley additive explanation values to interpret the predictive factors. Results: There were 72 patients who responded to the treatment, while 141 patients were considered non-responders. In total, 57 features were included, encompassing demographics, tumor status, treatment information, pre-treatment information, serum CBC, serum chemistry, and vital signs. The KNN model excelled among the models, achieving an AUROC score of 0.862 and outperforming the conventional PD-L1 biomarker's AUROC of 0.619. The top features influencing ICI treatment response include the ECOG performance status of 0, lower red cell distribution width, higher mean platelet volume, etc. Discussion: The significance of functional status, inflammatory biomarkers, and PD-L1 expression are revealed. This research underscores the potential of using a more nuanced combination of biochemical markers and clinical data to enhance the precision of immunotherapy efficacy predictions, compared with single prognostic biomarkers such as PD-L1. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the complex interplay among various risk factors that influence the effectiveness of ICI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.