ArticleCureus2025
Hybrid AI Framework for the Early Detection of Heart Failure: Integrating Traditional Machine Learning and Generative Language Models With Clinical Data.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the research landscape of artificial intelligence in heart failure: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Toward Artificial Intelligence in Oncology and Cardiology: A Narrative Review of Systems, Challenges, and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- AI Tools for Heart Failure Management: A Comprehensive Review of Potential, Pitfalls, and Predictive Analytics.Cureus · 2025Review
- Unveiling the Future of Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis: The Transformative Role of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Culture-Negative Cases.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality globally, necessitating innovative approaches for early detection and risk stratification. This study introduces a hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) model that synergistically combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the accuracy of heart failure (HF) prediction. The CNN component effectively captures spatial patterns from structured clinical data, while the LLM component interprets complex, unstructured information, enabling a comprehensive analysis of patient health records. Our hybrid model achieved a superior accuracy of 95.1%, outperforming standalone models and demonstrating high precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) metrics. Key predictive features (risk factors, symptoms, signs, and electrocardiogram (ECG) investigations) identified include Chest Pain Type, Maximum Heart Rate (maxHR), and Exercise-Induced Angina, aligning with established clinical indicators of cardiac risk. Integrating explainable AI (XAI) techniques, such as Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), provides transparency into the model's decision-making process, fostering trust and facilitating clinical adoption. These findings underscore the potential of hybrid AI models to revolutionize cardiovascular diagnostics by providing accurate, interpretable, and clinically relevant predictions, thereby supporting healthcare professionals in making informed decisions and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.