Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636829›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

JUMPSTART pilot: assessing the acceptability and feasibility of a novel early mobilization program following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Marija Corovic, Karen Mosleh, Esha Karia, Sachi Chan, Olivia Puglisi, Jacob Crawshaw, Tasmiya Asif, Tej Sheth, James Velianou, Patrick Magloire and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marija CorovicDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Karen MoslehDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Esha KariaLynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.
Sachi ChanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Olivia PuglisiDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jacob CrawshawCentre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Tasmiya AsifDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Tej ShethDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
James VelianouDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Patrick MagloireDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
J D SchwalmDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Madhu NatarajanDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are typically discharged from hospital the next day, leaving little time to support mobilization needs. The JUMPSTART program was developed as a self-directed, tailored and virtual exercise program to improve post-TAVR patients' mobilization. This pilot evaluation assessed the acceptability and feasibility of the preliminary exercise module developed for the program. The evaluation was conducted at a regional cardiac centre in Ontario, Canada. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were contacted via telephone post-discharge and provided with an electronic link to the JUMPSTART exercise module. A second call was made, 14 days post-discharge, to gather feedback regarding module acceptability and feasibility, and to discuss barriers to participation, via a structured survey. Out of the 165 eligible patients who answered the phone when called post-discharge, 112 (68%) completed the survey. A major barrier to participating in the survey evaluation was the technological requirement. Sixty-eight respondents (61%) had done the recommended exercises; they were satisfied with the module (mean = 5.92; 1 = very dissatisfied and 7 = very satisfied) and most rated the exercises as being the "right level of difficulty" (56%). For the 44/112 (39%) who did not try the exercises, key barriers were being busy (

Indexed as

aortic stenosisaortic valve replacementearly mobilizationexercise programTAVITAVRvirtual program

Identifiers

PMID40636829
PMCPMC12237925

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.