ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Development of a predictive model for risk factors of multidrug-resistant bacterial pneumonia in critically ill post-neurosurgical patients.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting multidrug-resistant infections in ICU patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning models have emerged as pivotal tools for enhancing the predictive accuracy of multidrug-resistant bacterial pneumonia (MDR-BP) risk in critically ill patients following neurosurgery procedures. By enabling early risk stratification, these models facilitate timely diagnosis and proactive therapeutic interventions. However, existing prediction frameworks exhibit limitations in elucidating the relative importance of risk factors, thereby impeding precise clinical decision-making and individualized patient management. Objective: To evaluate the performance of six ensemble classification algorithms and three single classification algorithms in predicting MDR-BP risk factors among neurosurgical postoperative critically ill patients, identify the optimal predictive model, and determine key influential factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 750 neurosurgical patients admitted to a neurosurgery center at a tertiary hospital in Beijing between January 2020 and December 2023. Following rigorous data preprocessing, univariate analysis was performed to screen statistically significant variables. The Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to address class imbalance. Predictive models for MDR-BP risk factors were constructed, and their performance was validated using 10-fold cross-validation to assess mean accuracy, recall, and specificity. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was employed to quantify feature importance. Results: The Random Forest model demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest mean accuracy (0.775) and AUC value (0.860) compared to other models. SHAP interpretation revealed three critical predictors of MDR-BP: intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), antibiotic treatment duration, and serum albumin level. Conclusion: The Random Forest algorithm demonstrates superior predictive accuracy for MDR-BP risk in critically ill post-neurosurgical patients. ICU-LOS, antibiotic treatment duration, and serum albumin level are significant predictors of MDR-BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.