Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636987›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2025

Nuclear Receptor ERRγ Protects Against Cardiac Ischemic Injury by Suppressing GBP5-Mediated Myocardial Inflammation.

Junhao Qiu, Qianji Che, Yichao Zhang, Mu Chen, Zhixing Wei, Yangjinming Bai, Tingting Zhao, Ji Yan, Zhengyang Wu, Zhentao Fei and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nuclear Receptor ERRγ Protects Against Cardiac Ischemic Injury by Suppressing GBP5-Mediated Myocardial Inflammation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Junhao QiuDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Qianji CheDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yichao ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Mu ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhixing WeiDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yangjinming BaiDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Tingting ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ji YanDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhengyang WuDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhentao FeiDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yuepeng WangDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Gang LiDepartment of Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-7212

Funding

MOE | Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities) YG2023QNB12MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 82070515MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 82370317Shanghai City Committee of Science and Technology Research Projects 19411963500the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82130009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial inflammation plays a critical role in the progression of injury following myocardial infarction (MI), yet the transcriptional mechanisms regulating cardiomyocyte inflammation to mitigate post-ischemic injury remain poorly understood. This study elucidated the role of Estrogen-Related Receptor Gamma (ERRγ) in modulating the inflammatory response post-MI, demonstrating that ERRγ expression was downregulated in ischemic tissue and hypoxic neonatal mouse ventricular myocytes (NMVMs). Cardiomyocyte-specific overexpression of ERRγ reduced infarct size, improved cardiac function, and suppressed excessive myocardial inflammation and pyroptosis by binding to the GBP5 promoter, thereby inhibiting GBP5 transcription and reducing NLRP3 inflammasome assembly. The protective effects of ERRγ overexpression were reversed by overexpressing GBP5, and the ERRγ agonist DY131 also improved cardiac function after MI. These findings suggest that ERRγ activation reduces myocardial ischemic injury by regulating cardiomyocyte inflammation and pyroptosis, highlighting ERRγ as a potential novel therapeutic target for attenuating post-MI injury.

Indexed as

InflammationMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaMyocardiumReceptors, EstrogenAnimalsInflammasomesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyocytes, CardiacNLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 ProteinPyroptosisEsrrg protein, mouseInflammasomesNLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 ProteinReceptors, EstrogenERRγGBP5inflammationmyocardial infarctionpyroptosis

Identifiers

PMID40636987
PMCPMC12242898

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.