ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025
What is the 'real-world' experience with fixed-ratio combination therapy (insulin + GLP-1 receptor agonist) in routine clinical practice? Take-home messages for clinicians regarding key outcomes.
Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Fixed Ratio Combinations to Improve Glycemic Control in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Experts' Opinion from the Gulf Region.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- What is the 'real-world' experience with fixed-ratio combination therapy (insulin + GLP-1 receptor agonist) in routine clinical practice? Take-home messages for clinicians regarding key outcomes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Review
- Switch from premixed insulin analogue to degludec-liraglutide combination: a CGM study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of a basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), IDegLira (insulin degludec/liraglutide) and iGlarLixi (insulin glargine/lixisenatide), offer a once-daily injectable treatment option for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), combining complementary mechanisms of action to target both fasting and postprandial hyperglycaemia. While randomized controlled trials have demonstrated their efficacy and safety, real-world evidence (RWE) provides important insights into their effectiveness, tolerability and use across routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a narrative review of selected real-world studies assessing the FRCs IDegLira and iGlarLixi in adults with T2D. Studies assessing the use of FRCs to intensify and simplify therapy, as well as their use in special populations such as older adults were reviewed and are summarized.
resultsAmong individuals inadequately controlled on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs), basal insulin ± OADs, or GLP-1 RAs, initiation of FRC therapy consistently improved glycaemic outcomes, supported modest weight loss or stability, and was associated with a low risk of hypoglycaemia. FRCs have also been evaluated as a strategy for simplifying complex insulin regimens. Transitions from basal-bolus or premixed insulin to FRCs maintained or improved glycaemic control while reducing total daily insulin dose and injection burden. Evidence in special populations and clinical contexts further supports the utility of FRCs. In older adults, FRC use was associated with reductions in HbA1c and hypoglycaemia risk, along with improvements in treatment satisfaction and functional measures. During Ramadan fasting, iGlarLixi demonstrated favourable glycaemic control, low hypoglycaemia incidence, modest weight loss and high adherence. Studies assessing glycaemic control using continuous glucose monitoring showed improvements in time in range, reductions in time above range and stable time below range, indicating enhanced glycaemic stability without increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Two real-world head-to-head studies comparing IDegLira and iGlarLixi found both FRCs to be effective and well tolerated. IDegLira was associated with greater weight loss and lower insulin dose requirements, while iGlarLixi showed advantages in postprandial glucose control. Both agents demonstrated significant improvements in HbA1c and low rates of hypoglycaemia.
conclusionsCollectively, these real-world studies confirm that FRCs are effective, safe and patient-centred treatment options for adults with T2D. Their simplified dosing, metabolic benefits and favourable safety profiles support their use for both therapy intensification and de-intensification across a broad spectrum of clinical scenarios. These findings reinforce results from randomized controlled trials, providing further confidence in the role of FRCs in contemporary diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.