Evidence mapPaperPMID 40637050Full record

ReviewDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2025

What is the 'real-world' experience with fixed-ratio combination therapy (insulin + GLP-1 receptor agonist) in routine clinical practice? Take-home messages for clinicians regarding key outcomes.

Juan Pablo Frias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of Fixed Ratio Combinations to Improve Glycemic Control in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: Experts' Opinion from the Gulf Region.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Juan Pablo FriasDepartment of Medicine, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9486-1255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of a basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), IDegLira (insulin degludec/liraglutide) and iGlarLixi (insulin glargine/lixisenatide), offer a once-daily injectable treatment option for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), combining complementary mechanisms of action to target both fasting and postprandial hyperglycaemia. While randomized controlled trials have demonstrated their efficacy and safety, real-world evidence (RWE) provides important insights into their effectiveness, tolerability and use across routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a narrative review of selected real-world studies assessing the FRCs IDegLira and iGlarLixi in adults with T2D. Studies assessing the use of FRCs to intensify and simplify therapy, as well as their use in special populations such as older adults were reviewed and are summarized.

resultsAmong individuals inadequately controlled on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs), basal insulin ± OADs, or GLP-1 RAs, initiation of FRC therapy consistently improved glycaemic outcomes, supported modest weight loss or stability, and was associated with a low risk of hypoglycaemia. FRCs have also been evaluated as a strategy for simplifying complex insulin regimens. Transitions from basal-bolus or premixed insulin to FRCs maintained or improved glycaemic control while reducing total daily insulin dose and injection burden. Evidence in special populations and clinical contexts further supports the utility of FRCs. In older adults, FRC use was associated with reductions in HbA1c and hypoglycaemia risk, along with improvements in treatment satisfaction and functional measures. During Ramadan fasting, iGlarLixi demonstrated favourable glycaemic control, low hypoglycaemia incidence, modest weight loss and high adherence. Studies assessing glycaemic control using continuous glucose monitoring showed improvements in time in range, reductions in time above range and stable time below range, indicating enhanced glycaemic stability without increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Two real-world head-to-head studies comparing IDegLira and iGlarLixi found both FRCs to be effective and well tolerated. IDegLira was associated with greater weight loss and lower insulin dose requirements, while iGlarLixi showed advantages in postprandial glucose control. Both agents demonstrated significant improvements in HbA1c and low rates of hypoglycaemia.

conclusionsCollectively, these real-world studies confirm that FRCs are effective, safe and patient-centred treatment options for adults with T2D. Their simplified dosing, metabolic benefits and favourable safety profiles support their use for both therapy intensification and de-intensification across a broad spectrum of clinical scenarios. These findings reinforce results from randomized controlled trials, providing further confidence in the role of FRCs in contemporary diabetes care.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsBlood GlucoseDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationGlucagon-Like Peptide-2 ReceptorGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingLiraglutidePeptidesTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseDrug CombinationsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like Peptide-2 ReceptorGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsIDegLiraInsulin GlargineInsulin, Long-ActingLiraglutidelixisenatidePeptidesfixed‐ratio combinationGLP‐1 analogueiGlarLixiinsulin analoguesreal‐world evidence

Identifiers

PMID40637050
PMCPMC12308270

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.