Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637217›Full record

SynthesisInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025

Olfactory Impairment and Incident Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Brian Sheng Yep Yeo, Harris Jun Jie Muhammad Danial Song, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Adithya Suresh, Owen Tsung Wen Ho, Jun He Chan, Esther Yanxin Gao, Claire Jing-Wen Tan, Chong Boon Teo, Christopher Li-Hsian Chen and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Brian Sheng Yep YeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5686-4615
Harris Jun Jie Muhammad Danial SongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Benjamin Kye Jyn TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-6164
Adithya SureshYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Owen Tsung Wen HoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jun He ChanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0005-4815-3975
Esther Yanxin GaoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-7845
Claire Jing-Wen TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4529-2978
Chong Boon TeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-2766
Christopher Li-Hsian ChenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Laura TayDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ecosse L LamoureuxHealth Services and System Research Department, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8674-5705
Thomas HummelSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-0183
Anna SeeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2126-4665
Shuhui XuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Song Tar TohDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-2457
Tze Choong CharnDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-2846
Neville Wei Yang TeoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6537-3308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlfactory impairment (OI) is associated with poor ageing outcomes. While cross-sectional studies found a high prevalence of OI among patients with neurodegenerative diseases, the temporal relationship remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to synthesise the longitudinal association of OI with cognitive decline (CD).

methodsPubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched through August 9, 2024 for longitudinal studies reporting on self-reported and objectively measured OI in adults, in association with CD, measured using validated methods. The outcome of interest was incident CD. Independent authors extracted data, assessed for bias and graded the strength of evidence. A mixed-effects meta-analysis with subgroup, sensitivity and bias analyses was conducted. The population-attributable fraction (PAF) of OI-associated CD was calculated.

resultsThis study included 48 articles and 37,783 participants. OI patients had a 2.06-fold greater risk of any CD (risk ratio [RR] = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.87‒2.26, I

conclusionOI may increase the risk of CD, with poorer olfaction linked to greater risks. OI should be assessed as a potential cognitive screening tool, and cognitive screening should be considered in patients with long-standing OI.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionOlfaction DisordersHumansIncidencecognitive declinecognitive impairmentdementiaolfactory impairment

Identifiers

PMID40637217
PMCPMC12676659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.