ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2025
Burden of Disease of Borderline Personality Disorder: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Life and Societal Cost of Illness.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Burden of Disease of Treatment-Seeking Patients With a Cluster-C Personality Disorder in the Netherlands; Quality of Life, Functioning, and Societal Costs.Journal of clinical psychology · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the BSL-23 (English translation) and its equivalency with the BSL-23 (German): an analysis based on Item Response Theory.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Information on the burden of disease, including quality of life (QoL) and societal costs, of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is crucial, as healthcare policymakers consider the burden of disease when setting priorities for treatment reimbursement. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the burden of disease of BPD by estimating annual costs from a societal perspective using a bottom-up approach and distinguishing between costs primarily related to psychological and somatic problems. QoL was determined using a generic QoL measure (EQ-5D five-level version [EQ-5D-5L]) as well as a measure specifically designed for individuals with psychological problems (Mental Health Quality of Life seven-dimensional questionnaire [MHQoL-7D]). Additionally, societal costs and QoL were compared with a comparison group. Data from 204 Dutch treatment-seeking outpatients diagnosed with BPD and 86 individuals without severe psychological problems were analyzed. The results indicated a severely impaired QoL (EQ-5D-5L: 0.51, MHQoL-7D: 0.24) combined with substantial societal costs (average total €35,038 per year) for BPD outpatients, markedly different from the comparison group. Societal costs of BPD were primarily attributable to psychological problems, with costs in other sectors as the main cost driver. The BPD group incurred higher costs for most patient and family cost items and cost items in other sectors, whereas differences in healthcare costs were limited to outpatient psychiatric treatment, consultations with general practitioners, emergency care, and social work. The high economic burden, along with the low QoL, suggests that increased treatment reimbursement for BPD would benefit both patients and society at large. Trial Registration: The BOOTS study was registered in the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (NL-OMON21337), formerly known as the Netherlands Trial Register.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.