ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Prevalence, Clinical Factors and Impact of Dysphagia After Cardiac Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigate the prevalence, instigating factors, and clinical impact of dysphagia in the perioperative period after cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) to develop a management protocol. We evaluated patients that underwent selected cardiac surgeries for CHD that had a feeding evaluation over a 5-years period from 2018 to 2023 at a university based, tertiary care urban pediatric hospital. Demographic information, medical and surgical history, vocal fold mobility, clinical and instrumental swallow evaluation findings and feeding modality were reviewed. There were 398 (predominately infant) patients, median age at surgery was 1.1 (IQR 0.20-9.9) months with 181 (46%) females. A clinical and/or instrumental feeding evaluation was performed in all patients. Tube feeding was the primary means of feeding in 232 (58.3%) of patients at the time of initial postoperative discharge. Postoperative instrumental swallow data was available in 198 (49.7%) of patients. The median dysphagia outcomes and severity score (DOSS) of these patients was 4 (IQR2-5). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that single ventricle cardiac disease (OR 5.1, p = 0.018), vocal cord motion impairment (VFMI) (OR 5.6, p = 0.002), clinical concern for aspiration on postoperative evaluation (OR 6.1, p = 0.005), and a longer time between surgery and post-surgery clinical evaluation (OR 26.7, p = 0.048) were associated with need for tube feeding at discharge. Perioperative dysphagia requiring tube feeding is common after cardiac surgery for patients with CHD. The incidence is influenced by predicable factors. A protocolized approach utilizing these factors to screen for and manage perioperative dysphagia in these patients can improve their care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.