Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40638107›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2025

Diversified Segmental Defocus Optimization Lenses With and Without Atropine for Myopia Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yuchang Lu, Xue Yang, Jingwei Zhou, Sitong Chen, Xuewei Li, Yuanqi Deng, Yixuan Zhang, Yan Li, Kai Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spectacle lenses for control of myopia progression in children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identifying and Managing Pre-Myopia: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuchang LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xue YangPeking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jingwei ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sitong ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuewei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuanqi DengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yixuan ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: With growing myopia prevalence worldwide, effective strategies to prevent early-onset myopia are needed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of diversified segmental defocus optimization (DSDO) spectacle lenses with or without 0.01% atropine for myopia prevention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was 1-year randomized placebo-controlled double-masked clinical trial conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at Peking University People's Hospital from November 2023 to December 2024. Children aged 5 to 12 years with spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of 0.00 to 1.00 diopters (D) after cycloplegia were included, excluding those with ocular diseases, systemic diseases, or previous use of optical or pharmaceutical myopia control methods. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive DSDO spectacles with placebo eye drops (DSDO group), DSDO spectacles with 0.01% atropine eye drops (DSDOA group), or single-vision spectacles with placebo eye drops (control group). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the cumulative incidence rate of myopia (defined as SER ≤-0.50 D) and the percentage of participants with fast myopic shift (defined as a spherical equivalent myopic shift ≥0.50 D) over 1 year. Secondary outcomes included changes in SER, axial length, and subfoveal choroidal thickness. Results: Of the 450 children initially randomized (DSDO group: mean [SD] age, 7.05 [0.12] years; 77 [51.3%] male; DSDOA group: mean [SD] age, 7.02 [0.14] years; 73 [48.7%] male; control group: mean [SD] age, 7.01 [0.11] years; 78 [52.0%] male), 370 (82.2%) completed the study, including 121 in the DSDO group, 125 in the DSDOA group, and 124 in the control group. The 1-year cumulative incidence rates of myopia in the DSDO, DSDOA, and control groups were 5.8% (7/121), 4.8% (6/125), and 15.3% (19/124), respectively, and the percentages of participants with fast myopic shift after 1 year were 15.7% (19/121), 9.6% (12/125), and 42.7% (53/124). Both DSDO and DSDOA groups showed significantly lower 1-year cumulative myopia incidence (DSDO: difference, 9.5%; 95% CI, 1.9-17.5; P = .02; DSDOA: difference, 10.5%; 95% CI, 3.3-18.4; P = .006) and the percentage of patients with fast myopic shift (DSDO: difference, 27.0%; 95% CI, 16.1-37.3; P < .001; DSDOA: difference, 33.1%; 95% CI, 23.1-42.8; P < .001) vs control. No significant differences were observed between DSDO and DSDOA groups. Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that daily use of DSDO spectacles delays the onset of myopia among children without myopia, supporting DSDO spectacles without atropine as an alternative preventive method for children without myopia if supported with longer follow-up and replication by others. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300077307.

Indexed as

AtropineEyeglassesMydriaticsMyopiaRefraction, OcularChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleOphthalmic SolutionsTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityAtropineMydriaticsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID40638107
PMCPMC12246953

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.