Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2025
Diversified Segmental Defocus Optimization Lenses With and Without Atropine for Myopia Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- New design peripheral defocus spectacle lens vs. single-vision for slowing myopia progression in children: randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- The Comparative Effectiveness of Four Myopia-Control Spectacle Lenses: A Real-World AIPW Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comments on Diversified segmental defocus optimization lenses with and without atropine for myopia prevention: a randomized clinical trial.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Spectacle lenses for control of myopia progression in children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Effect of combining peripheral defocus spectacle lens wear with 0.01% atropine.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Three Myopia Control Lenses: A Multicenter, Real-World Study of 5182 Adolescents and Children in Chongqing, China.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Identifying and Managing Pre-Myopia: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- A Predictive Model for Personalized Fitting of Peripheral Defocus Spectacles Based on Ocular Biometric Parameters.Clinical optometry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: With growing myopia prevalence worldwide, effective strategies to prevent early-onset myopia are needed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of diversified segmental defocus optimization (DSDO) spectacle lenses with or without 0.01% atropine for myopia prevention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was 1-year randomized placebo-controlled double-masked clinical trial conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at Peking University People's Hospital from November 2023 to December 2024. Children aged 5 to 12 years with spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of 0.00 to 1.00 diopters (D) after cycloplegia were included, excluding those with ocular diseases, systemic diseases, or previous use of optical or pharmaceutical myopia control methods. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive DSDO spectacles with placebo eye drops (DSDO group), DSDO spectacles with 0.01% atropine eye drops (DSDOA group), or single-vision spectacles with placebo eye drops (control group). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the cumulative incidence rate of myopia (defined as SER ≤-0.50 D) and the percentage of participants with fast myopic shift (defined as a spherical equivalent myopic shift ≥0.50 D) over 1 year. Secondary outcomes included changes in SER, axial length, and subfoveal choroidal thickness. Results: Of the 450 children initially randomized (DSDO group: mean [SD] age, 7.05 [0.12] years; 77 [51.3%] male; DSDOA group: mean [SD] age, 7.02 [0.14] years; 73 [48.7%] male; control group: mean [SD] age, 7.01 [0.11] years; 78 [52.0%] male), 370 (82.2%) completed the study, including 121 in the DSDO group, 125 in the DSDOA group, and 124 in the control group. The 1-year cumulative incidence rates of myopia in the DSDO, DSDOA, and control groups were 5.8% (7/121), 4.8% (6/125), and 15.3% (19/124), respectively, and the percentages of participants with fast myopic shift after 1 year were 15.7% (19/121), 9.6% (12/125), and 42.7% (53/124). Both DSDO and DSDOA groups showed significantly lower 1-year cumulative myopia incidence (DSDO: difference, 9.5%; 95% CI, 1.9-17.5; P = .02; DSDOA: difference, 10.5%; 95% CI, 3.3-18.4; P = .006) and the percentage of patients with fast myopic shift (DSDO: difference, 27.0%; 95% CI, 16.1-37.3; P < .001; DSDOA: difference, 33.1%; 95% CI, 23.1-42.8; P < .001) vs control. No significant differences were observed between DSDO and DSDOA groups. Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that daily use of DSDO spectacles delays the onset of myopia among children without myopia, supporting DSDO spectacles without atropine as an alternative preventive method for children without myopia if supported with longer follow-up and replication by others. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300077307.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.