ArticlePloS one2025
The efficacy and safety of topical wound oxygen therapy for chronic refractory wounds at high altitude: Protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for high-altitude skin injuries: pathological mechanisms, advanced Nano-delivery, and translational perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe hypobaric and hypoxic characteristic of plateau regions can lead to sustained hypoxia, inadequate tissue perfusion, and an inflammatory response at wounds sites. Topical wound oxygen therapy (TOT) shows potential in elevating transcutaneous oxygen tension, stimulating the production of vascular endothelial growth factor, promoting angiogenesis and tissue remodeling, thereby accelerating wound healing. However, there is a scarcity of research investigating the therapeutic efficacy of TOT for treating chronic refractory wounds in long-term inhabitants of plateau areas. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TOT as a viable treatment option for chronic refractory wounds in individuals residing in high-altitude environments. Positive findings could establish TOT as a valuable and safe complementary strategy for managing such wounds in high-altitude settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial involving 250 patients residing at high altitudes. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either TOT or sham oxygen therapy over a 12-week period, followed by a one-year follow-up. In addition to the experimental interventions, all participants will receive standard care for their chronic wounds. The primary outcome measure is the wound healing rate at the end of the 12-week intervention. Secondary endpoints include the reduction in ulcer area after intervention, the time required for ulcer healing, the recurrence rate of ulcers, the amputation rate, pain levels, and any adverse events.
trial registrationThe trial has been officially registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and assigned the registration number ChiCTR-2400083602.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.