Observational studyThe journal of pain2025
Disparities in diagnosis and management of chronic overlapping pain conditions in an observational study of medicare beneficiaries.
Observational study in The journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Centralized Pain Diagnoses in Older Adults With and Without Cancer.Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- Chronic pain and type 2 diabetes: associations between neuropathic and nociplastic pain conditions, health behaviors, and mental health in veterans.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disparities in care and management of pain among racial groups have been demonstrated in various studies. Chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs) have yet to be examined. This was an observational cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries from 2018-2020 analyzing COPC diagnosis rates and prescription claims. Nationally representative 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2018-2020. Medicare beneficiaries ≥ 66 years of age in 2019 were included if they had ≥ nine months of A/B/D coverage in 2018-2020. Beneficiaries were excluded if they had Medicare Advantage or end-stage renal disease. Prevalence of COPC diagnosis using validated ICD-10 codes in Medicare beneficiaries and disparities in diagnosis and management. In 2019, 2,573,165 patients were included in the analysis; 87% were White, 8% Black, and 1.7% Asian. COPC diagnosis prevalence in Medicare beneficiaries was more than 10% (n=273,996). Black (odds ratio [OR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.88-0.91]) and Asian (OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71]) patients were less likely to have a COPC diagnosis. The incidence of a new COPC diagnosis was 11.4% (n=31,281) among Medicare beneficiaries; only 24.1% (n=7541) received COPC-targeted prescriptions. Black (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.02-1.26]), and Asian (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.06-1.63]) beneficiaries were more likely to receive COPC-targeted prescriptions. Black (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.01-1.25]) beneficiaries were more likely to receive opioids. Examination of associations, not causations or reasons underlying the identified disparities. The prevalence of COPC diagnosis in Medicare beneficiaries was 10%, but only one-quarter of those received COPC-targeted prescriptions. Disparities in COPCs persist into COPCs for Black beneficiaries. PERSPECTIVE: The study examines the prevalence and management of COPCs in older adults using Medicare data. It found racial disparities in diagnosis and prescriptions, with Black and Asian beneficiaries less likely to receive a diagnosis. Opioid use remains high despite known ineffectiveness, highlighting the need for better pain management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.