ArticleWomen's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)2025
Pregnant women's eHealth literacy and attitudes toward internet health information and their relationship to shared decision making: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a health literacy scale for nutrition and supplement use among pregnant and postpartum women.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2026Article
- Associations between pregnant women's attitudes toward, and literacy in, artificial intelligence, and their association with perceived influence of internet-based information on decision-making.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- New developments in women's health research and implications for nursing.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated eHealth literacy and attitudes toward internet health information among pregnant women and analyzed the associations between these factors and shared decision-making related to pregnancy and birth.
methodsThe participants were 130 pregnant women receiving care at an obstetrics and gynecology department of a tertiary general hospital in Seoul, Korea. Data on eHealth literacy, attitudes toward internet health information, and shared decision-making were collected via an online survey conducted in October 2024. The collected data were analyzed using frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, the independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and hierarchical multiple regression.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 31.73±2.86 years. Thirty percent of the participants were in early pregnancy, 37.7% in mid-pregnancy, and 32.3% in late pregnancy. The mean eHealth literacy score was 4.11±0.75, indicating a high level. The average score for attitudes toward internet health information was 4.10±0.73, reflecting positive attitudes. The mean score for shared decision-making was also high, at 4.17±0.73. Higher eHealth literacy and more positive attitudes toward internet health information were found to significantly influence shared decision-making (F=41.03, p<.001), explaining 46.3% of the variance.
conclusionA high level of eHealth literacy and positive attitudes toward internet health information are important for promoting shared decision-making among pregnant women. Public institutions should offer educational programs that improve the ability to search for and utilize health information. In clinical settings, specialized counselors should be employed to provide personalized education and accurate information supporting informed maternal health decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.