Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640046›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation for prolonged infusion of levobupivacaine with or without epinephrine in transversus abdominis plane and erector spinae plane blocks: a randomised controlled trial and analysis of pooled data.

Andrea Araneda, J C De la Cuadra, Marcia Corvetto, Detlef Balde, René de la Fuente, Mauricio Ibacache, Víctor Contreras, Sandra Solari, Ignacio Cortínez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04799184 (Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Levobupivacaine with and Without Epinephrine After Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04799184 phase4completednot on this map

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Levobupivacaine with and Without Epinephrine After Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2019 to 2022Enrolled38ConditionsAnesthetics Complications, Anesthetic Toxicity, Bupivacaine Overdose, Nerve BlockArmsLevobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 ug/ml, Levobupivacaine 0.25% without epinephrine 5 ug/ml
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Erector spinae plane block.BJA education · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea AranedaDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
J C De la CuadraDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Marcia CorvettoDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Detlef BaldeDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
René de la FuenteDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Mauricio IbacacheDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Víctor ContrerasDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile; Departamento del Adulto, Escuela de Enfermería, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Sandra SolariCentro de Información Toxicológica UC, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Ignacio CortínezDivisión de Anestesiología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile. Electronic address: icortinez@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterfacial blocks often require large volumes of local anaesthetic, raising concerns about systemic absorption and potential toxicity. This study examined the pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine with and without epinephrine during thoracic erector spinae plane (ESP) or transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, simulating reported 48-h dosing regimens to evaluate safety.

methodsData from three studies were analysed. Study 1 included 38 patients receiving an ESP block before video-assisted thoracoscopy, whereas Study 2 analysed published data on TAP blocks. Both studies used 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.25% with or without epinephrine (5 μg ml

resultsWe analysed 258 ESP samples, 150 TAP samples, and 190 bupivacaine i.v. SAMPLES: A one-compartment model described the data, with a mean distribution volume of 41.9 L (coefficient of variation, 47%) and clearance rate of 0.288 L min

conclusionsSimilar dosing regimens for ESP and TAP blocks are supported by this pharmacokinetic analysis, with epinephrine effectively reducing systemic drug concentrations by prolonging absorption half-life and lowering bioavailability. The findings suggest that extended 300 mg per 24 h dosing for 48 h is likely to be safe. Further studies in broader patient populations are warranted to evaluate safety. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT04799184.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalBupivacaineEpinephrineLevobupivacaineNerve BlockAbdominal MusclesAdultFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVasoconstrictor AgentsYoung AdultAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineEpinephrineLevobupivacaineVasoconstrictor Agentserector spinae plane blockinterfacial blocklocal anaestheticpharmacokinetic modellingregional anaesthesiasystemic toxicitytransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID40640046
PMCPMC12674050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.