SynthesisScientific reports2025
Childhood predictors of religious reading: a cross-national analysis in the Global Flourishing Study.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative "report card" wellbeing assessment of 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.Discover global society · 2026Article
- Details of exposure during childhood of the original children (G1s) in the ALSPAC study to aspects of religious faith and spirituality.Wellcome open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the family environment, including parental religiosity, shapes children's religious behaviors, evidence concerning factors influencing religious reading and listening (RR/L) in adulthood remains scarce. This study examines 13 early-life conditions within familial and economic contexts as potential predictors of adult RR/L. Nationally representative samples from 22 countries (N = 202,898) included in the first wave of the Global Flourishing Study were used. Multiple imputation, multivariate regression analyses, and random-effects meta-analyses were employed to evaluate associations between the childhood predictors and adult RR/L. Meta-analytical results show that early-life predictors, including religious service attendance, a positive relationship with one's father, excellent self-assessed health, experience of abuse, and growing up as an outsider, as well as belonging to older cohorts and being female are associated with higher likelihood of adult RR/L, with religious service attendance being the strongest predictor. There was little evidence of associations with childhood financial status, immigration status, and mother-child relationship. Country-specific analyses revealed that race/ethnicity and religious affiliation also influence the RR/L likelihood, with Muslims and minority group members showing a higher probability compared to other groups. Given the rare examination of early-life determinants of RR/L, especially in cross-cultural contexts, this study provides valuable insights into the global distribution of early-life predictors of RR/L.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.