ArticleJournal of diabetes2025
Characterization of Novel WFS1 Variants in Three Diabetes Pedigrees.
Article in Journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of Novel WFS1 Variants in Three Diabetes Pedigrees.Journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- A novel heterozygous WFS1 variant of uncertain significance in a patient with early-onset diabetes: a case report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMutations in the WFS1 gene are implicated in Wolfram syndrome (WS), Wolfram-like syndrome (WFLS), and maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Wolfram syndrome 1 (WFS1) is a diabetes-related gene encoding wolframin, a glycoprotein with nine transmembrane domains localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. However, the relationship between WFS1 mutations and their associated phenotypes remains incompletely understood, requiring additional patient data collection for further investigation. Here we collected and analyzed clinical data from three diabetes pedigrees, and to assess the genotype-phenotype correlation.
methodsHigh-throughput sequencing was employed to detect WFS1 gene mutations, followed by pathogenicity and conservation analysis using bioinformatics software. A three-dimensional wolframin protein structure was constructed to investigate the potential effects of the mutations. Moreover, the distribution of WFS1 mutations and their associated clinical phenotypes were analyzed by summarizing genetic variations of the WFS1 gene recorded in the Human Gene Mutation Database.
resultsFour heterozygous WFS1 mutations were identified in three diabetes families. Among these, c.1523_1524del/p.Y508Cfs*34 was identified as a frameshift mutation, while the others were missense mutations. Bioinformatics predictions revealed that c.766A>G/p.K256E is a benign and novel mutation, whereas the remaining mutations were classified as pathogenic. Furthermore, c.985T>A/p.F329I was validated as a MODY-associated mutation within a specific family. A comprehensive summary of all reported WFS1 mutations indicated that mutations associated with WS phenotypes are approximately 18.7 times more frequent than those associated with MODY phenotypes. Missense mutations accounted for the highest proportion of WFS1 mutations associated with different clinical phenotypes, with the majority located in exon 8.
conclusionsThis study identified a novel WFS1 mutation, c.766A>G/p.K256E, expanding the known mutation spectrum of the WFS1 gene. The findings suggest that inactivating mutations and benign missense mutations are associated with more severe WS phenotypes compared to purely pathogenic missense mutations. Moreover, c.985T>A/p.F329I was validated as a MODY associated mutation. Finally, by summarizing the genotype-phenotype relationships of WFS1, it is concluded that the WFS1 gene shows a different association with WS, WFSL and MODY.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.