Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641105›Full record

ReviewMolecular medicine reports2025

Antifungal resistance: Emerging mechanisms and implications (Review).

Ika N Kadariswantiningsih, Maulana A Empitu, Timotius Imanuel Santosa, Yikelamu Alimu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ika N KadariswantiningsihDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, East Java 60131, Indonesia.
Maulana A EmpituDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, East Java 60131, Indonesia.
Timotius Imanuel SantosaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, East Java 60131, Indonesia.
Yikelamu AlimuDepartment of Cutaneous Allergy and Host Defense, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Honshu 5650871, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antifungal resistance is a growing concern in clinical medicine, driven by the increasing incidence of fungal infections and the limited arsenal of effective antifungal drugs. This resistance is achieved by intrinsic mechanisms, such as ineffective drug‑target binding, high efflux pump activity and unique cell wall and membrane composition, as well as acquired mechanisms, including genetic mutations, gene duplication, transposon insertions, aneuploidies and loss of heterozygosity. Antifungal tolerance, characterized by subpopulations of fungal cells that persist and proliferate even at high drug concentrations, complicates treatment. The present review aimed to examine the genetic, physiological and epigenetic factors that contribute to antifungal resistance and tolerance. Understanding these mechanisms may enable the development of novel antifungal therapies and effective diagnostic strategies to combat the increasing threat of resistant fungal infection. Advanced diagnostic tools and combination therapies are key for managing resistant infections and ongoing research into these mechanisms may enhance the ability to mitigate antifungal resistance.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDrug Resistance, FungalFungiCell MembraneCell WallDrug ToleranceEpigenesis, GeneticGenes, MDRHumansMycosesAntifungal Agentsantifungalepigeneticinfectious diseaseresistance

Identifiers

PMID40641105
PMCPMC12272148

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.