Trial reportJournal of pediatric psychology2025
Diabetes distress among caregivers of adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDiabetes distress (DD), the negative emotional response related to the burdens of diabetes management, has been studied primarily in adults with type 2 diabetes and youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D), but less is known about DD among caregivers of youth with T1D.
methodsCaregivers of adolescents with T1D (n = 198, Mage = 45.6 ± 7.3, 84% female, 66% non-Hispanic White) were enrolled in a two-site randomized clinical trial aimed at treating DD among adolescents. The current study is a secondary analysis of baseline data to examine factors associated with DD among caregivers. Caregivers completed measures of DD, diabetes-related family conflict, and adolescents' diabetes self-management behaviors. Caregivers also reported on demographic factors, and clinical data were extracted from adolescents' medical records.
resultsFemale caregivers, caregivers of younger adolescents, caregivers reporting lower household income, caregivers of lower subjective social status, and single/nonpartnered caregivers reported significantly higher caregiver DD. Further, after adjusting for demographic factors, higher diabetes-related family conflict and lower adolescent diabetes self-management behaviors were associated with significantly higher caregiver DD.
conclusionsCorrelates of caregiver DD provide insight into potential risks and modifiable factors that may help clinicians develop interventions to target caregiver DD to improve outcomes in both caregivers and adolescents with T1D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.