Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641972›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Explainable AI for time series prediction in economic mental health analysis.

Ying Yang, Lifen Wen, Li Li

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying YangShaanxi Institute of Teacher Development, Xi'an, China.
Lifen WenMedical College, Xijing University, Xi'an, China.
Li LiTaizhou Vocation College of Science Technology, School of Accounting Finance, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) into time series prediction plays a pivotal role in advancing economic mental health analysis, ensuring both transparency and interpretability in predictive models. Traditional deep learning approaches, while highly accurate, often operate as black boxes, making them less suitable for high-stakes domains such as mental health forecasting, where explainability is critical for trust and decision-making. Existing Methods: To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework that integrates explainability directly within the time series prediction process, combining both intrinsic and post-hoc interpretability techniques. Our approach systematically incorporates feature attribution, causal reasoning, and human-centric explanation generation using an interpretable model architecture. Results: Experimental results demonstrate that our method maintains competitive accuracy while significantly improving interpretability. The proposed framework supports more informed decision-making for policymakers and mental health professionals. Discussion: This framework ensures that AI-driven mental health screening tools remain not only highly accurate but also trustworthy, interpretable, and aligned with domain-specific knowledge, ultimately bridging the gap between predictive performance and human understanding.

Indexed as

causal reasoningExplainable AIinterpretabilitymental health analysistime series prediction

Identifiers

PMID40641972
PMCPMC12241169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.