ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Explainable AI for time series prediction in economic mental health analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A dual attention transformer modelling for explainable mental health analysis in academic environments using TaBERT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) into time series prediction plays a pivotal role in advancing economic mental health analysis, ensuring both transparency and interpretability in predictive models. Traditional deep learning approaches, while highly accurate, often operate as black boxes, making them less suitable for high-stakes domains such as mental health forecasting, where explainability is critical for trust and decision-making. Existing Methods: To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework that integrates explainability directly within the time series prediction process, combining both intrinsic and post-hoc interpretability techniques. Our approach systematically incorporates feature attribution, causal reasoning, and human-centric explanation generation using an interpretable model architecture. Results: Experimental results demonstrate that our method maintains competitive accuracy while significantly improving interpretability. The proposed framework supports more informed decision-making for policymakers and mental health professionals. Discussion: This framework ensures that AI-driven mental health screening tools remain not only highly accurate but also trustworthy, interpretable, and aligned with domain-specific knowledge, ultimately bridging the gap between predictive performance and human understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.