Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641992›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials translational2025

Hydrogel-based biomaterials for brain regeneration after stroke: Gap to clinical translation.

Hanlai Li, Tingting Gu, Jingjing Xu, Lin Gan, Chang Liu, Jixian Wan, Zhihao Mu, Haiyan Lyu, Zhibin Wang, Qianqian Liu and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials translational, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hanlai LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Tingting GuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jingjing XuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lin GanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Chang LiuDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jixian WanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Med-X Research Institute and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhihao MuDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunan Province, China.
Haiyan LyuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhibin WangLingyi iTECH Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Qianqian LiuAnkerui (Shanxi) Biological Cell Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China.
Jie ChenJiangsu Charity Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Yaohui TangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the limited effects of current treatments on brain repair and regeneration, stroke continues to be the predominant cause of death and long-term disability on a global scale. In recent years, hydrogel-based biomaterials combined with stem cells and extracellular vesicles have emerged as promising new treatments to improve brain regeneration after stroke. However, the clinical translation of hydrogel-based biomaterials for the treatment of brain injury is still far from satisfactory. In this review, we first summarise the present status of stroke-related clinical treatments and the advantages provided by hydrogel-based materials in combination with stem cells and extracellular vesicles in preclinical studies. We then focus on the possible causes of the gap between preclinical studies and clinical translation of hydrogel-based biomaterials from the perspective of biocompatibility and safety, the choices of preclinical models, the lack of clinical noninvasive imaging methods, standardisation and quality control, manufacturing scalability, and regulatory compliance. With the progress in the abovementioned areas, we believe that the clinical translation of hydrogel-based biomaterials will greatly improve brain regeneration after stroke and that this improvement will be realised by the general public in the near future.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsClinical translationHydrogelStroke

Identifiers

PMID40641992
PMCPMC12237804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.