ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in adult patients with refractory rheumatic disease-associated macrophage activation syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Ruxolitinib for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis complicated by macrophage activation syndrome: two pediatric cases and literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Ruxolitinib combined with corticosteroids for the successful treatment of kawasaki disease-associated macrophage activation syndrome: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Ruxolitinib for rheumatic disease-associated macrophage activation syndrome in children: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Treatment of refractory lung disease in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with cyclophosphamide and rituximab combination therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of uterine immune microenvironment remodeling in a murine model of adenomyosis.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Article
- Low-dose emapalumab treatment in refractory macrophage activation syndrome secondary to adult onset still's disease/systemic lupus erythematosus: insights from nine cases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Rheumatic disease Methods: A meticulous chart review was conducted on 20 refractory RD-MAS patients treated with ruxolitinib. Data from no ruxolitinib treatment RD-MAS patients served as historical controls. Clinical and laboratory parameters, therapeutic response, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Ruxolitinib's efficacy and safety were evaluated, and survival rates were compared to historical controls. Results: The cohort included 20 refractory RD-MAS patients (17 females, 3 males) with underlying conditions: adult-onset Still's disease (n = 13), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 4), and other connective tissue diseases (CTDs) (n = 3). All patients displayed active disease at baseline. By week 8, 50% (10/20) of patients achieved partial remission, while 30% (6/20) attained complete remission. The ruxolitinib group had a significantly higher survival rate (19/20, 95%) compared to historical controls (13/21, 62%) (P = 0.011). By week 8, the median daily glucocorticoid dose dropped from 2.7 mg/kg to 0.5 mg/kg. Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 20% (4/20) of patients. Conclusion: Ruxolitinib demonstrated substantial efficacy and tolerability in refractory RD-MAS, improving clinical outcomes and reducing glucocorticoid dependence. Although limited by its retrospective nature and small cohort size, this study suggests that ruxolitinib may serve as a potential therapy for refractory RD-MAS, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.