ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[AI in rehabilitation-application of artificial mental models for personalized medicine].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) can support patient-centered care in prevention and rehabilitation. In Germany, almost 1.9 million patients were treated in rehabilitation hospitals in 2023, mostly due to musculoskeletal disorders. The success of rehabilitation depends on cooperation between patient, doctor, and therapist as well as active participation. However, cognitive limitations, language barriers, and psychological factors tackle decision-making and communication abilities of patients. This leads to incomplete or distorted data and impairs individualized therapy. A potential solution approach is to apply artificial mental models (AMMs) that anticipate patients' unknown mental models. These concepts are based on cognitive science theories and world models from AI. AMMs can optimize treatment decisions, correct misjudgments, and thus increase the success of rehabilitation. Particularly in knee rehabilitation, an AI agent can determine how patients perceive their recovery and enable individual adjustments. The BMFTR project FedWELL investigates the use of AMM in rehabilitation. A non-discriminatory base model was developed using data from online forums, user studies, and machine learning models. Initial results show that AI-supported models can predict individual assumptions and expectations of patients within the rehabilitation process and enable personalized therapies. This article presents the research design of the project and reports the first results of the initial survey phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.