Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40643792›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025

Rapid trauma classification under data scarcity: an emergency on-scene decision model combining natural language processing and machine learning.

Jun Tang, Tao Li, Liangming Liu, Dongdong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun TangDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Tao LiDepartment of Shock and Transfusion, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Liangming LiuDepartment of Shock and Transfusion, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China. lmliu62@tmmu.edu.cn.
Dongdong WuDepartment of Information, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China. 604269346@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7826-5963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trauma has become a major cause of increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. In emergency response, the classification of injuries is crucial as it helps to quickly determine the criticality of the injured, allocate rescue resources rationally, and decide the priority order of treatment. However, emergency scenes are often chaotic environments, making it difficult for rescue personnel to collect complete and accurate information about the injured in a short period. The combination of artificial intelligence and emergency rescue is gradually changing the rescue model, improving the efficiency of rescue operations. We selected data from 26,810 trauma patients admitted to Chongqing Daping Hospital between 2013 and 2024. We propose a fast tiered medical treatment method with a two-layer structure under emergency limited data conditions, which integrates natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques. The tiered medical treatment model utilizes NLP to capture semantic features of unstructured text data, while utilizing four ML algorithms to process structured numerical data. Additionally, we conducted external validation using 245 data entries from the Chongqing Emergency Center. The experimental results show that gradient boosting and logistic regression have the best performance in the two-layer ML algorithms. Based on these two algorithms, our model outperformed the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model on the test dataset, achieving an accuracy of 91.17%, which is 4.33% higher than that of the MLP model. The specificity, F1-score, and AUC of our model were 97.06%, 86.85%, and 0.949, respectively. For the external dataset, the model achieved accuracy, specificity, F1-score, and AUC of 87.35%, 95.78%, 80.37%, and 0.848, respectively. These results demonstrate the model's high generalizability and prediction accuracy. A model integrating NLP and ML techniques enables rapid tiered medical treatment based on limited data from the emergency scene, with significant advantages in terms of prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNatural Language ProcessingWounds and InjuriesAlgorithmsEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleInjury severity scoreMachine learningNatural language processingTiered medical treatmentTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40643792
PMCPMC12675745

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.