Trial reportPloS one2025
Breathing therapy for patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms and dysfunctional breathing: A pilot and feasibility trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06575920 (Breathing Therapy for Patients With Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms and Dysfunctional Breathing), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Breathing Therapy for Patients With Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms and Dysfunctional Breathing: A Pilot and Feasibility Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are symptoms without an identifiable organic cause that lead to functional impairment. MUPS is highly prevalent in general practice consultations. This pilot trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of a 5-week breathing retraining program focusing on basic anatomy and physiology, breathing awareness, nasal breathing and resonance (coherent) breathing for patients meeting the criteria for MUPS. The trial used a quantitative design with pre- and post-intervention measurements. Fifteen participants with MUPS and dysfunctional breathing (assessed by the Nijmegen Questionnaire) were recruited from two general practitioner offices. The intervention consisted of 5 weekly sessions including education on breathing physiology and weekly breathing exercises focused on nasal breathing and resonance breathing techniques. One week post intervention, improvements were observed in dysfunctional breathing scores, lower symptom severity, higher general well-being, and reduced musculoskeletal pain complaints. At 3 months post-intervention, sustained improvements were seen in dysfunctional breathing, general well-being, musculoskeletal pain, and additionally lower pseudoneurological, gastrointestinal, and allergy complaints, as well as lower overall symptom burden and improved end-tidal CO2 levels. The trial concluded that the 5-week breathing program showed promising results for improving multiple patient-reported outcomes in MUPS. Recruitment, adherence, and acceptability of the program were satisfactory. A randomized controlled trial is recommended to further evaluate the efficacy of this breathing intervention for MUPS patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06575920.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.