Evidence mapPaperPMID 40644485Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Pulmonary function and comparative SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgG antibody response among the COVID-19 recovered group.

Abu Bakar Siddik, Arman Faisal, Abdullah-Hel-Kafi Khan, Md Meer Mahbubul Alam, Jannatul Nayeem, Umme Kulsum, Sharmin Aktar Mukta, Zannat Kawser, Imrul Hasan, Kasrina Azad and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Abu Bakar SiddikInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5027-4902
Arman FaisalDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ingenious Health Care Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abdullah-Hel-Kafi KhanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ingenious Health Care Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Meer Mahbubul AlamDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ingenious Health Care Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jannatul NayeemDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ingenious Health Care Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Umme KulsumInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sharmin Aktar MuktaInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8608-8753
Zannat KawserInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Imrul HasanInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kasrina AzadInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Moajjam HossainInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sanchita KarInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nishat SultanaInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Rabiul AlamDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ingenious Health Care Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ahmed MustafaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ingenious Health Care Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Tanbir HabibInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Edward T RyanDepartment of Immunology and Infectious diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Firdausi QadriInfectious Disease Division, Institute for Developing Science and Health initiatives, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Rashidul HassanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ingenious Health Care Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) responsible for millions of deaths and substantial morbidity worldwide. Several studies report that up to 50% of individuals who recover from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection experience a plethora of long-COVID symptoms that may persist for weeks, months, or even up to a year. Abnormal pulmonary function is one of the most critical manifestations of long-COVID, even after recovering from COVID-19. Understanding the long-term pulmonary consequences and immune response among individuals recovering from COVID-19, who experienced disease severity ranging from mild to severe, is crucial for comprehensive post-recovery care and vaccination strategies.

methodsThis prospective case-control study included 29 individuals who had recovered from COVID-19 with a history of mild to severe symptoms and 64 controls. Assessments of pulmonary functional measures, such as FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, FEF, MEF, and PEF were carried out following recovery from COVID-19. Additionally, IgG antibody responses were examined by ELISA for up to six months through multiple follow-ups following two doses of vaccination, with an additional follow-up 30 days after the booster dose (third dose).

resultsPulmonary functional abnormalities were prevalent in the recovered group, which had previously exhibited varying symptom severity (53% mild, 66% moderate, and 50% severe) compared to the control group (23%). Higher IgG antibody titers were observed among the recovered group, with significantly elevated titers in severe and moderate cases following vaccination. After vaccination, the recovered group showed significantly higher titers at day 14, particularly in the severe (1418 IU/mL) and moderate (1390 IU/mL) groups, compared to the control group (968 IU/mL) (p < 0.005). Notably, antibody titers were negatively correlated with pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters such as Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1). All groups experienced a significant (p < 0.005) decrease in antibody titers within 90-120 days after receiving two doses of vaccination. After five to six months, antibody titers returned to baseline levels, highlighting the importance of vaccination and additional booster doses regardless of previous infection history. Overall, our study underscores the significance of pulmonary function assessment post-COVID-19 recovery for long-term respiratory health and emphasizes the importance of vaccination regardless of infection history.

conclusionTo assess the impact of long-COVID on respiratory health, this study underscores the importance of evaluating pulmonary function in individuals, whether they had symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19. Furthermore, the findings from the immune response analysis highlight the critical role of vaccination, regardless of infection history, as a key strategy of pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralBetacoronavirusCOVID-19Immunoglobulin GLungSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsProspective StudiesRespiratory Function TestsAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID40644485
PMCPMC12250562

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.