Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40644503›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An Evaluation of the United Kingdom Motor Neuron Disease Nurses and Allied Health Professionals (UK MND NAHP) Workforce: A Census.

Isaac Chau, Ethan Stoker, Jessica Gill, Judith Newton, United Kingdom Motor Neuron Disease Nurses and Allied Health Professionals Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diverging trends in motor neuron disease burden in China: an ageing-driven increase despite declining age-standardised rates - a GBD 2021 analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isaac ChauAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5893-1229
Ethan StokerAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Jessica GillAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2736-5583
Judith NewtonAnne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
United Kingdom Motor Neuron Disease Nurses and Allied Health Professionals Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, motor neuron disease assessment and management should be a coordinated, clinic-based, multidisciplinary team approach. However, the wellbeing, work experiences, and the alignment with national frameworks and standards of the motor neuron disease (MND) nurses and allied health professionals' workforce are severely underreported and under-researched within the literature. Therefore, this report aimed to capture the workforce and their alignment with national frameworks and standards, and to assess their experiences working as an MND health care professional. A pragmatic research paradigm and a mixed methods approach was employed using a cross-sectional questionnaire survey to collect, compare, and interpret quantitative and qualitative data points. Data was gathered under the remit of an audit and service evaluation under NHS Lothian. Demographics data and work-related characteristics were collected. Job experience and wellbeing were collected using Likert scales and open-ended questions. The level of burnout was assessed using the validated tool, the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). Compliance with national frameworks were based on the NICE guidelines and the Scottish MND Advanced Clinical Nurse Specialist Pillars of Practice Competencies. 64 HCPs completed the questionnaire, with the majority of respondents from England (54.7%) and Scotland (35.9%). Education level was mainly having a Bachelors (or equivalent) degree (40%) or a Masters (or equivalent) degree (31%), with the remaining having a diploma-based qualification (29%). The analysis revealed three key themes: the importance of the multi-disciplinary team (MDT), the roles and the level of competencies, and the benefits and challenges in providing direct care. This was associated with 14% and 12% of respondents being at medium and high risk of burnout, respectively. This report highlighted the importance of a collaborative MDT to support the needs of patients, their carers/ family members and HCPs themselves. The workforce found the flexibility, autonomy, and variety within their role beneficial where almost 80% of the respondents engaged in 8 of the 15 competencies. The benefits of providing direct care were found to be associated with feeling valued by the patients, their carers/ family members, and the core and extended MDT, and feeling satisfied about their work. The perceived challenges of providing direct care involved isolation, lack of direct funding, and a high caseload with complex needs and not enough time to provide quality care. It is recommended that a national competency programme or a Masters level course in MND care should be developed to maintain the quality of care, and future research should aim to evaluate the entire workforce longitudinally, address organisational barriers, and explore burnout preventative strategies to maintain a resilient workforce.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelMotor Neuron DiseaseNursesAdultBurnout, ProfessionalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID40644503
PMCPMC12250277

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.