ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Insomnia and sleepiness during pregnancy: Associations with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insomnia and sleepiness during pregnancy: Associations with gestational diabetes mellitus.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSleep quality typically deteriorates during pregnancy, and poor sleep is a risk factor for pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The present study is the first longitudinal study addressing associations between sleep quality and GDM at separate time-points throughout the pregnancy. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study was a part of the FinnBrain cohort, including 3808 pregnant women. Sleep quality was assessed using the Basic Nordic Sleep Questionnaire four times during pregnancy, and GDM was diagnosed by glucose tolerance testing. Four groups were formed: non-GDM, GDM, and two subgroups of GDM (medical nutritional therapy and GDM with pharmacotherapy). Paired comparisons within the groups between different time-points were conducted, and cross-sectional logistic regression analyses were carried out. The results were adjusted by maternal age, body mass index, parity, education, smoking, mood symptoms, and pre-eclampsia.
resultsIn paired comparisons between time-points, the insomnia score increased during pregnancy, albeit similarly in the GDM and non-GDM groups. However, the pattern of changes in sleepiness score differed between the groups during pregnancy. In the non-GDM group, mean scores showed a U-shape, decreasing in mid-pregnancy. This decrease was not observed in the GDM group, with scores remaining similar between early and mid-pregnancy and higher compared with the non-GDM group. These differences were more pronounced in the pharmacotherapy subgroup. In the cross-sectional analysis, only a few differences emerged between the groups. Women in the GDM group were more likely to report poor general sleep quality in mid-pregnancy compared with women in the non-GDM group (aOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9, p = 0.037), but no differences in distinct insomnia symptoms emerged. Sleepiness symptoms were more common in the GDM group in early pregnancy (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.1, p = 0.028) and in mid-pregnancy (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.1, p = 0.030). Women in the GDM pharmacotherapy subgroup reported daytime napping more often in mid-pregnancy (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3, p = 0.049).
conclusionsInsomnia was found to increase as pregnancy proceeds, independently of GDM. However, the decrease in sleepiness found in women without GDM in mid-pregnancy was not observed in women with GDM, possibly indicating that the effectiveness of sleep is compromised in GDM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.