ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Standardizing Survey Data Collection to Enhance Reproducibility: Development and Comparative Evaluation of the ReproSchema Ecosystem.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building an open infrastructure for molecular neuroimaging: Standards and tools from the OpenNeuroPET initiative.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- Building an open ecosystem for molecular neuroimaging: standards and tools from the OpenNeuroPET initiative.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInconsistencies in survey-based (eg, questionnaire) data collection across biomedical, clinical, behavioral, and social sciences pose challenges to research reproducibility. ReproSchema is an ecosystem that standardizes survey design and facilitates reproducible data collection through a schema-centric framework, a library of reusable assessments, and computational tools for validation and conversion. Unlike conventional survey platforms that primarily offer graphical user interface-based survey creation, ReproSchema provides a structured, modular approach for defining and managing survey components, enabling interoperability and adaptability across diverse research settings.
objectiveThis study examines ReproSchema's role in enhancing research reproducibility and reliability. We introduce its conceptual and practical foundations, compare it against 12 platforms to assess its effectiveness in addressing inconsistencies in data collection, and demonstrate its application through 3 use cases: standardizing required mental health survey common data elements, tracking changes in longitudinal data collection, and creating interactive checklists for neuroimaging research.
methodsWe describe ReproSchema's core components, including its schema-based design; reusable assessment library with >90 assessments; and tools to validate data, convert survey formats (eg, REDCap [Research Electronic Data Capture] and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), and build protocols. We compared 12 platforms-Center for Expanded Data Annotation and Retrieval, formr, KoboToolbox, Longitudinal Online Research and Imaging System, MindLogger, OpenClinica, Pavlovia, PsyToolkit, Qualtrics, REDCap, SurveyCTO, and SurveyMonkey-against 14 findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) principles and assessed their support of 8 survey functionalities (eg, multilingual support and automated scoring). Finally, we applied ReproSchema to 3 use cases-NIMH-Minimal, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development and HEALthy Brain and Child Development Studies, and the Committee on Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing Checklist-to illustrate ReproSchema's versatility.
resultsReproSchema provides a structured framework for standardizing survey-based data collection while ensuring compatibility with existing survey tools. Our comparison results showed that ReproSchema met 14 of 14 FAIR criteria and supported 6 of 8 key survey functionalities: provision of standardized assessments, multilingual support, multimedia integration, data validation, advanced branching logic, and automated scoring. Three use cases illustrating ReproSchema's flexibility include standardizing essential mental health assessments (NIMH-Minimal), systematically tracking changes in longitudinal studies (Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development and HEALthy Brain and Child Development), and converting a 71-page neuroimaging best practices guide into an interactive checklist (Committee on Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing).
conclusionsReproSchema enhances reproducibility by structuring survey-based data collection through a structured, schema-driven approach. It integrates version control, manages metadata, and ensures interoperability, maintaining consistency across studies and compatibility with common survey tools. Planned developments, including ontology mappings and semantic search, will broaden its use, supporting transparent, scalable, and reproducible research across disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.