ArticleBMJ open2025
Feasibility of digital healthcare in enhancing healthcare access in semiurban areas of Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative descriptive study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOur research aimed to assess the feasibility of digital health in enhancing healthcare access in the semiurban areas of Karachi, Pakistan. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingThis qualitative descriptive study was employed at three villages in Gadap, Karachi, Pakistan, with varying socioeconomic contexts, using a feasibility framework. Ethical approval was provided by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of The Aga Khan University. STUDY
participantsThrough purposive sampling, demand and supply-side stakeholders (N=152) were invited to participate in the study, including community leaders, activists and members, representatives from non-governmental organisations, public and private sector healthcare providers, and digital healthcare providers and experts. Both inductive and deductive approaches were used for data analysis. MEASURE OF OUTCOMES: The assessment of feasible demand-side and supply-side factors would be extremely useful in the planning and implementation of a sustainable digital health programme.
resultsDigital health is an acceptable and practically feasible option and is a potential solution to enhance healthcare access and equity, particularly in semiurban and rural remote areas, where healthcare access is limited. Digital healthcare should not replace inperson healthcare but should instead be offered in combination with it, preferably through a 'Hub & Spoke Model' facility
conclusionOur study concludes that digital healthcare is a dire need and is a potential solution to enhance healthcare access and equity, as it is acceptable and practically feasible. A mix of inperson and digital health consultation should be offered through a hub and spoke model. Few challenges to implementing digital health exist and should be addressed by tailoring digital health through co-creation and engaging all stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.