ReviewEye (London, England)2025
Understanding nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy progression using noninvasive imaging.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association between socioeconomic status and diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy stage identification: A DTA systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Lipid homeostasis plays a critical role in inherited and acquired retinal diseases.Communications biology · 2026Review
- One-Year Progression of Capillary Nonperfusion in Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Noninvasive Imaging: The CHART Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Observational
- Screening and evaluation of therapeutic candidates with vascular protective effects in zebrafish models of diabetic retinopathy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well accepted that only a subset of individuals with diabetes is expected to progress to advanced retinopathy and is at risk of losing functional vision. It is, therefore, of major relevance to identify this subset of patients and when they enter into rapid progression. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity scale is the classic gold standard for grading diabetic retinopathy progression. The fundus abnormalities seen in Diabetic Retinopathy can conceptually be split into three main phenotypes. Those resulting from retinal neurodegeneration, those related to an alteration of the Blood-Retinal Barrier and, finally, those resulting from ischemia. In eyes showing the ischemic phenotype, disease progression is characterized by an initial stage of increasing hypoperfusion involving initially the superficial capillary plexus with progressive involvement of the deep capillary plexus followed by an hyperperfusion response consisting of dilated shunt vessels and intraretinal microvascular abnormalities. Visual acuity is generally maintained as the retinopathy progresses to loss of visual acuity as a result of either clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). It is the microvascular changes that occur in response to the progressive capillary closure and the hyperperfusion response characterized by abnormally dilated shunt vessels that create the conditions for CSMO and PDR. Our present understanding of the progress of diabetic retinal disease indicates that prevention of the major vision-threatening complications, may be addressed by either halting the progressive ischemia which characterises the initial hypoperfusion stage or by targeting the angiogenic and inflammatory response that follows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.