ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2025
Accurate determination of breed origin of alleles in a simulated smallholder crossbred dairy cattle population.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assignment of breed origin of alleles (BOA) at a heterozygote locus may help to introduce a resilient or adaptive haplotype in crossbreeding. In this study, we developed and tested a method to assign breed of origin for individual alleles in crossbred dairy cattle. After generations of mating within and between local breeds as well as the importation of exotic bulls, five rounds of selected crossbred cows were simulated to mimic a dairy breeding program in the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In each round of selection, the alleles of those crossbred animals were phased and assigned to their breed of origin (being either local or exotic).
resultsAcross all core lengths and modes of phasing (with offset-move 50% of the core length forward or no-offset), the average percentage of alleles correctly assigned a breed origin was 95.76%, with only 1.39% incorrectly assigned and 2.85% missing or unassigned. On consensus, the average percentage of alleles correctly assigned a breed origin was 93.21%, with only 0.46% incorrectly assigned and 6.33% missing or unassigned. This high proportion of alleles correctly assigned a breed origin resulted in a high core-based mean accuracy of 0.99 and a very high consensus-based (most frequently observed assignment across all the scenarios) mean accuracy of 1.00. The algorithm's assignment yield and accuracy were affected by the choice of threshold levels for the best match of assignments. The threshold level had the opposite effect on assignment yield and assignment accuracy. A less stringent threshold generated higher assignment yields and lower assignment accuracy.
conclusionsWe developed an algorithm that accurately assigns a breed origin to alleles of crossbred animals designed to represent breeding programs in the LMICs. The developed algorithm is straightforward in its application and does not require prior knowledge of pedigree, which makes it more relevant and applicable in LMICs breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.